The following subject is solely that of the blog administrator, and does not reflect the thoughts and/or political beliefs of the Central California Conservatives.
Over this past weekend, we read and heard several GOP pundits discuss Pres. Obama's ill-advised "distancing" from the Defense of Marriage Act, (DOMA). Some of them declared this to be an impeachable offense, as the POTUS, under no circumstances can make law or decide arbitrarily which laws to uphold, but is mandated by the Constitution to uphold it, an oath he took on January 20, 2009. Even Newt Gingrich weighed in on the topic in an interview with Newsmax:
http://www.salon.com/news/newt_gingrich/?story=/politics/war_room/2011/02/27/gingrich_religious_right_republican_nomination
The "I" word has been used on a couple of occasions since Barack took office back in January 2009, but the preponderance of websites/blogs dealing with this matter are mainly focused on his place of birth, and not more substantive issues. This is not to declare that a candidate does not need to fulfill all the requirements for the highest office in this land, but simply an admission that if the Clinton Political Machine could not uncover the discrepancies in his place of birth, the argument is probably moot.
But where were these same pundits when Obama fired Rick Wagoner? Where were these same politicos when the UAW was placed ahead of the primary bond holders in the bankruptcy judgements of GM and Chrysler? Where in the Constitution does it grant the POTUS the ability to fire a CEO of a privately held company and circumvent the laws pertaining to bankruptcy? I fully understand that a judge ruled in favor of the Obama administrations' decision to rig the bankruptcy decision in favor of the UAW, but does that make the ruling right...does it absolve Pres. Obama?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=awCyiNlvcfUA
And just where were these talking heads when the worst environmental disaster in our lifetime occured in the Gulf of Mexico? [administrators note-this topic will be further explored in another blog topic]
Certainly, Darryl Issa (R) Ca., chairman of the House Congressional Oversight Board, has his work cut out for him, and is currently involved in many investigations at the moment. But his efforts, so far, are being stonewalled and/or ignored by the Obama administration:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48717.html
Further, it appears that Issa's efforts are striking too close to home, as the Democrat machine is in full attack mode against Cong. Issa:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49521.html
Now I will add my "two cents" worth in speculation and dot connecting and by doing so, add fuel to the fire without necessarily mentioning the "I" word.
As many of you may know, Glenn Beck ran a three part series describing in great detail the type of man George Soros really is. It was an interesting expose/exposure of a man that has collapsed several other economies, while personally profiting enormously. Soros' 'New World Order' is possible because of a global economy, but also because it appears he believes he's God and enjoys crushing people/countries..it's all a game to him. Beck did a very good job of using Soros' own words through interviews, manuscripts and videotapes to describe Soros' intent. Although I knew for quite some time that Soros was the puppetmaster, Beck solidified my perceptions.
What I discovered on my own, as far back as early Spring of 2009, is a very interesting sequence of events…actually, the connections of several known pieces of information, that when viewed in a different light, makes for some rather interesting speculation. Remember when after Obama was elected Nov 2008, he began holding Press conferences as "President Elect" and he went on a two month tirade about how bad our economy was? Obama, on an almost weekly basis, was hammering our economic plight and in doing so, the Dow Jones reacted in a very calculated way…it dropped another ~20-25%. So why was Obama beating the pulp out of the Dow? Why did he use his bully pulpit to daily demean, belittle and degrade our economic plight? No one, including the talking heads at Fox could understand. Some speculated that he was just trying to get his Stimulus Package rammed through before anyone actually read it. But he continued his assault even after he knew the Bill's passage was a done deal. Also consider that he really didn’t need to convince Congress…he had the votes in the House, and all he needed was one or two GOP Senators to vote for the ARRA and it would pass. He basically knew that Olympia Snow and Susan Collins were on board, and that Arlen Specter was an easy target, especially considering the extra “pork” written into the SP for Pennsylvania…so he knew he had the votes in both houses to pass the Bill. So why did he hammer our economy? Because Soros was shorting the US stock market, and a 20-25% fall meant hundreds of millions of dollars of profit..if not more. Soros makes his money and is “paid back” for his anonymous campaign donations, and could continue to fund his shadow media outlets…all at the expense of US citizens…the money bilked from us out of our 401K’s. Pretty slick, huh? The President purposely manipulated the stock market to benefit a political campaign contributor...the puppetmaster.
Soros shorting the US stock market in 2008:
"Soros has bet on declines in the dollar, 10-year Treasuries and U.S. and European stocks this year." Interestingly, he went on to state this at the end of the article: [Asked if such moves would make it impossible to achieve returns like those of his pre-2000 days, Soros laughed. "Since I'm designing these regulations, they would not hurt me,'' he said] Oh Really?!
Now, my conjecture continues. Remember after Obama's Invesco Field acceptance speech in Colorado on August 28th? The media was totally enamored with his rhetorical skills, his suave, debonair presentation, his supposed high intellect and his command of the English language, not to mention his Harvard Law School pedigree. His poll ratings went very high after that speech, as the media pushed Obamamania. Then, six days later, an unknown Governor from Alaska comes along, a newcomer to the political scene, a "country bumpkin" without the Ivy League credentials, and takes the stage in Minneapolis and completely blows away Obama's speech and with it, the media as well. The polls reversed. Check the dates.
I believe the Progressives were in full panic mode, and Soros came to their rescue. How? I'm now of the belief that he, and a "few" of his friends helped accelerate the crash of our financial markets...the timing was just WAY too convenient. Certainly Bear-Stearns and Lehman Bros were toast at that point, but the big tipping point had yet to surface... Fannie and Freddie. Dumping Fannie/Freddie's MBS paper on the market would have done it, a fact that was well known, even by Vladimir Putin. Soros' Hedge Funds were implicated in the demise of our market:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=afbSjYv3v814
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=afbSjYv3v814
Click on the pdf file to read his prepared statements. And having Henry Waxman conduct this "investigation" is analogous to having Mr. Magoo perform your root canal surgery. Of note...neither Fannie or Freddie were part of the Financial Reform Act/Law and neither was hedge fund regulation addressed. Is that what Soros meant in the statement above when he stated he was writing the regulations? Having Chris Dodd and Barney Frank write the Finance Reform Bill is like having Jeffrey Dahmer and John Gacy watch your kids for the weekend. Soros' buddy, John Paulson made billions off of the sub-prime market, and Soros was "all ears":
Market manipulation in order to further tank the economy, and thus get "their boy", Barack Obama, elected is what I suspect. Whether through bond dumping, naked shorting, derivatives market manipulation...it all stinks from my chair. But purposeful manipulation of the stock market in order to reward a major campaign contributor...well, as hard as it is to prove, it certainly makes sense, considering what I've read so far, the dots I've connected and Obama's actions since that time. More on this later.
March 5th Update:
Just this past week, a report written by Kevin Freeman for the Dept of Defense was released entitled "Economic Warfare: Risks and Responses". The publication was generated in 2009, but just now released. The report can be viewed and read at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49755779/Economic-Warfare-Risks-and-Responses-by-Kevin-D-Freeman
It is an informative, if not chilling account describing our economic collapse in 2008 and how this occurence may have been expedited by outside "influences". To a great degree, it mirrors my speculation written above, (to all you nattering naybobs of disbelief)...conjecture I began to formulate back in the Spring of 2009. I suggest that anyone reading this blog, read the above link...all 111 pages.
Page 35:
"Upon reaching the rational conclusion that bear raids did take place and that these
Considering that Soros has hedge funds located offshore, it would be impossible to trace his transactions. Mr. Freeman's speculation that the ChiCom military and Russia were also involved in the bear raids makes perfect sense to me. Read the last two paragraphs on page 35, and you will begin to see what I speculated two years ago. More on this later.
March 5th Update:
Just this past week, a report written by Kevin Freeman for the Dept of Defense was released entitled "Economic Warfare: Risks and Responses". The publication was generated in 2009, but just now released. The report can be viewed and read at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49755779/Economic-Warfare-Risks-and-Responses-by-Kevin-D-Freeman
It is an informative, if not chilling account describing our economic collapse in 2008 and how this occurence may have been expedited by outside "influences". To a great degree, it mirrors my speculation written above, (to all you nattering naybobs of disbelief)...conjecture I began to formulate back in the Spring of 2009. I suggest that anyone reading this blog, read the above link...all 111 pages.
Page 35:
"Upon reaching the rational conclusion that bear raids did take place and that these
directly triggered the economic turmoil, the next logical question become, ―Who Did It?
Unfortunately, this is a much more difficult question to answer with conclusiveness. Thereason is that there has been a serious lack of transparency in regard to the primaryinstruments used in bear raids, notably credit default swaps and naked short sales.Complicating the matter further is the fact that those who initiate the trades are typicallyhidden behind brokerage firms, hedge funds, foundations, and other client pools."
Considering that Soros has hedge funds located offshore, it would be impossible to trace his transactions. Mr. Freeman's speculation that the ChiCom military and Russia were also involved in the bear raids makes perfect sense to me. Read the last two paragraphs on page 35, and you will begin to see what I speculated two years ago. More on this later.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete